A Solana token is buying back an Ethereum art collection that spent three years waiting for someone to come for it. This page explains where every fee goes, what holders receive, how the draw is run, and how to verify all of it without taking our word for anything.
What is not live yet
REBELS has not launched. There is no mint address, no pool and no trading. Locking is not open: the contract is not deployed, no fee share has been paid, and no draw has been held. Everything below describes the mechanism as designed and as it will run. Every figure elsewhere on this site is read live from the chain or from the published log — where a number cannot be read, the site shows -- rather than a zero.
REBELS trades on Meteora DBC → DAMM v2 with a 2% fee. Every creator fee goes to the treasury — none to the team, none to insiders — and accrues in SOL rather than in REBELS, so the treasury never has to sell the token it exists to support.
Each claim is then split two ways:
The split is not arbitrary. The whole collection costs roughly 221 SOL at the price ceiling and trades about twice a month, so the buyback is limited by how many Rebels are listed, not by how much money the treasury holds. Paying part of the fees to holders mostly spends capital that would otherwise sit idle — and unspent treasury is published rather than hidden.
Every Rebel the treasury buys goes to one of three places:
A quarter of everything reclaimed is destroyed, which sits in real tension with the claim that this work is worth saving. The argument is that a permanently smaller collection, most of it held by people who locked capital to get it, beats 5,604 pieces sitting in a market that never came back for them. Anyone who disagrees with that trade should not buy the token.
Locked positions are weighted by which escrow address the deposit went to, not by how long it has sat there: sending to LOCK_30 earns ×1, LOCK_90 earns ×2, and LOCK_180 earns ×3 — in full, the moment the lock is confirmed. Nothing computes a duration, so a dispute like “my lock turned 90 days at 23:58, why was I counted at ×1” cannot happen — there is no clock to be on the wrong side of. The weight is earned because the commitment behind it is real: choosing LOCK_180 locks the tokens for 180 days with no early exit, in exchange for the full ×3 from day one. The escrow addresses, the bands and who actually holds the tokens while they are locked are on /rewards. Eligibility is fixed at 00:00 UTC on the 1st of each month, and the draw uses a randomness round published 48 hours later. Both are fixed by the calendar so nobody chooses a convenient moment.
The randomness comes from drand, a public beacon run by a threshold network. Before the round exists, we publish the eligible list, the prize token IDs and the round number as a log entry. Nobody — including us — can know the value at that point.
Once that round publishes, anyone can compute the winners without us. Every input is public and the method is published, so a result cannot be quietly re-rolled. We can only fail to send the Rebels, and a committed draw with no matching transfers is conspicuous in a log that cannot be edited.
Eligibility itself comes straight from the public, hash-chained operation log — a confirmed lock with no matching return, as of the cutoff — so it does not need to be reconstructed from chain history at all. The full eligible list is published as part of the commitment, not only its fingerprint, so it can be checked directly rather than trusted.
-- rather than guessing or showing zero.Rebels launched in June 2022: 5,604 pieces of 3D artwork by Night Labs, built around a customisation system that let holders restyle their character in three dimensions.
In August 2023 the funding ran out. What Night Labs did next is why this project can exist: they open-sourced the entire render stack, moved every image and metadata file to Arweave, released the 3D source files, and handed the contracts to a community multi-signature wallet. That is not how a project is dropped. It is how one is put down carefully, in a state where it could be picked back up.
Then three years of quiet. The floor fell to a few ten-thousandths of an ether and trading dropped to almost nothing — but nothing broke. The contracts held, the render tooling still runs, and the artwork stayed addressed on Arweave the whole time, though the gateway serving those files is not currently resolving, so this site shows the same images from OpenSea’s cache in the meantime. The collection was never lost. It was waiting.
So the price has nothing to do with the work. It reflects a team that ran out of runway, not work that failed — and the market has not repriced it because nobody was bidding. The treasury is the bid.
REBELS is a funding mechanism for an art project. It is not an investment and it may lose all of its value. It gives you no ownership of the vault, no governance right and no entitlement to any specific Rebel.
What it is meant to do is pay you: locking it is the intended route to a share of fees and to receiving a Rebel, and both are things of real value delivered through the efforts of a team. In some jurisdictions that description matters legally. The Council took this decision knowing it, and says so here rather than leaving it implied.
Fee income depends on trading volume, and volume decays. This is not a perpetual buyback. The full limits are on /token, and the terms of use are on /terms.